Saturday, May 29, 2010

Chicago Criminal attorney is surprised by the rapid reassignment of judges on the defensive

This Chicago Criminal attorney posted here about the big story on Cook County Circuit Judges not working full time.  Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans response was breathtakingly fast in the wake of this scandal.

May 28, Chicago, Il

 Four Cook County judges shown leaving court early this week as part of a joint investigation between Fox Chicago News and the Better Government Association will be transferred and their duties changed beginning June 1, said Circuit Court of Cook County Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans in a prepared statement released Friday.
One judge was caught on videotape sunbathing while others were captured leaving early during daytime hours when the courts are typically open.
Gloria Chevere, Jim Ryan and Frank DeBoni were among the Chicago judges reassigned. Also reassigned was Cynthia Brim of Bridgeview's Fifth Municipal District.
The investigation also prompted Evans to assign mentors to the aforementioned judges and to appoint two new supervising judges to oversee Chicago's criminal branch courts, where three of the four judges had served.
While he acknowledged that a majority of the county's 428 judges work diligently, Evans said the measures were necessary to maintain public confidence in the judiciary.
"I do not want any unacceptable behavior of a few judges to undermine the credibility and integrity of our entire system of justice," Evans said in a prepared statement.
He also pointed out that a closed courtroom does not mean the judge isn't working. Judges frequently do research, review documents, conduct pretrial conferences and write decisions outside the courtroom.
"To conclude that a judge is not working because he or she is not sitting in a courtroom is egregiously unfair and inaccurate," Evans said.
The Chief Judge’s aforementioned comment about the ability for judges to be working even if they aren’t on the bench sounds familiar to this trial attorney.

1 comment:

  1. Last Friday, the Supreme Court rendered another opinion dealing with a criminal case in People v Roberto Dupree. The question presented was whether a defendant may assert the defense of self-defense when charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm contrary to MCL 750.224f. Redwood city dui